Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital

نویسندگان

  • Sunanda Gupta
  • Udita Naithani
  • C. Madhanmohan
  • Ajay Singh
  • Pradeep Reddy
  • Apoorva Gupta
چکیده

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30 min, and a delay of more than75 min in the presence of maternal or fetal compromise can lead to poor outcome. This prospective 1-year study was conducted on emergency CS in a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the DDI, factors affecting it and to analyze their effects on maternal and neonatal outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS A structured proforma was used to analyze the data from all women undergoing emergency CS, during a 1-year period, included in Category 1 and 2 of NICE guidelines for CS. RESULTS A total of 453 emergency CSs were evaluated, with a mean DDI of 36.3 ± 17.2 min for Category 1 CS and 38.1 ± 17.7 min for Category 2 CS (P > 0.05). Only 42.4% emergency CSs confirmed to the 30 min DDI while 57.6% had a DDI of more than 30 min. Reasons of delay were identified as a delay in shifting the patient to operation theater (22.1%), anesthesia factors (18.1%), and lack of resources or manpower (16.1%). Maternal complications occurred in 15 (3.3%) patients with 3 (0.7%) nonsurvivors having a DDI of 91.0 ± 97.0 min as compared to survivors with a DDI of 36.8 ± 15.7 min, P = 0.001. There was no significant association between DDI and occurrence of neonatal complications. CONCLUSION Failure to meet the current recommendations was associated with adverse maternal outcomes, but not with adverse neonatal outcome.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Re: A Five-year Survey of Cesarean Delivery at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital

Ugwu et al., 2011 [1] in their publication, in the last issue of the amhsr, did remarkably well in pointing out an increase in the rate of cesarean sections. They also noted that “the perinatal outcome is poor especially following emergency cesarean section (94.3%). [1] Reducing primary cesarean section rate and more encouragement of vaginal birth after one previous cesarean section may reduce ...

متن کامل

Decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean delivery in tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Objective To determine the decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) in emergency cesarean delivery and associated factors. Methods A total of 431 pregnant women who were indicated for emergency cesarean delivery were included. Clinical information and timing of process after decision until delivery and pregnancy outcomes were evaluated. Results Mean age was 30 years, and 59.4% were nulliparous. ...

متن کامل

Decision - delivery interval and perinatal outcome of emergency caesarean sections at a tertiary institution

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE A decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) of 30 minutes for emergency Caesarean sections (CS) has been widely recommended, but there is little evidence to support it. Recent studies however, have questioned not only the practicability of this target but also its anticipated beneficial effect on neonatal outcome and medico-legal implications. Our objective in this study was ...

متن کامل

Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section-are current standards achievable? Observational case series.

OBJECTIVES To audit interval from decision to delivery in urgent caesarean section to determine whether the current standard of 30 minutes is achievable routinely; to determine whether delay leads to an excess of admissions to special care. DESIGN Three audit cycles over four years followed by a continuous audit over 32 months. SETTING Large district general hospital delivering 5500 women e...

متن کامل

Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean sections at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco

INTRODUCTION Perinatal mortality rates have come down in cesarean sections, but fetal morbidity is still high in comparison to vaginal delivery and the complications are more commonly seen in emergency than in elective cesarean sections. The objective of the study was to compare the fetal outcome and the indications in elective versus emergency cesarean section performed in a tertiary maternity...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 33  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2017